Dynamics of a crazy guy:
Sitting down with a tricky/spew/bad player. There's dynamics there. There are times when you think that there is a % of the time where villain is spewing. I call it "X" frequency. You think it can be high so you call a crazy over bet with Tp or Mp or w.e. There are times when that "x" frequency is NOT high, and villain will be bluffing less than the average player. When he just shows a bluff, i don't think that "x" frequency of him spewing increases, I think that it decreases.
Once villain that's possible of spewing loses a big pot, that "x" frequency remains the same for some, and even increases for some. Most of the time it seems to be increasing.
Now, there are the players who once they double up, their "x" frequency of spewing goes to Nill, (0%). There are others who double up, and that "x" frequency goes higher or remain the same. But, I think for the majority, it decreases as they get more money.
My theory behind this is people become emotionally attached to money they "earned." They just doubled up, which is what they came to do, and want to not lose it.
How to choose the right play in these dynamics? -Take notes on those that spew and-win yet keep spewing (or stop spewing). Then, on those that spew-lose and keep spewing (or stop spewing.)
It's up to me to decide whether or not they will be capable of continuing their spew even being emotionally attached.
Excel results of yesterdays grind:
88% Playing poker, 12% studying poker.
Spent the time studying by looking through my HEM at specific hands I play and their profit/loss, (not in the blinds).
No comments:
Post a Comment